UNEP/GC.18/33/Annex
17 March 1995
ACC REPORT
TO UNEP GOVERNING COUNCIL 1995 ON
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN THE FIELD
OF THE ENVIRONMENT
THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM WIDE EARTHWATCH
Introduction
1.
This report is submitted to the Governing Council of the United Nations
Environment Programme (UNEP) by the Administrative Committee on Coordination
(ACC) pursuant to General Assembly resolutions 2997 (XXVII) of December
1972 on "Institutional and financial arrangements for international
environmental cooperation" and 32/197 of December 1977 on the restructuring
of the economic and social sectors of the United Nations system. The
topic selected for this report is the UNEP-led system-wide Earthwatch.
2.
One of the major achievements of the UNCED process was the general
acceptance that environment and development were closely inter-related
and must be considered together. This idea is embodied in the concept
of sustainable development. Since Rio, the challenge has been to give
this concept practical application. One major area where the United
Nations system can do this is in the implementation of Chapter 40
of Agenda 21 on "Information for Decision-Making". The Secretary General's
Report to the Commission on Sustainable Development on the implementation
of Chapter 40 of Agenda 21 addresses the general problem of providing
adequate information for decision-making on sustainable development.
This report however, focuses on the inter-agency dimension of the
implementation of Chapter 40.
3.
With its high levels of population growth and resource consumption,
the world is rapidly moving towards currently perceived planetary
limits, for which the growing global environmental problems are warning
signals. While there has been some progress, the overall trends are
still negative. It is possible that as these problems grow, they could
increasingly interact with negative feedback as global environmental
stresses increase, if remedial action is not taken. The basic capacities
of the planet to support human activity are being damaged. There is
an evident trade-off between the level of material development and
human well-being that will ultimately be sustainable on this planet,
and the care that we take of economic assets, natural resources, environmental
life-support systems and human capital. These in turn are influenced
by our population size, technology, and levels of resource consumption
and waste production. Information for decision-making in order to
provide a basis for sustainable development requires the integration
of all these environmental, economic and social dimensions at the
global, regional and national levels.
Earthwatch
4.
Earthwatch was first proposed at the Stockholm United Nations Conference
on the Human Environment in 1972 as a United Nations system-wide mechanism
coordinated by UNEP to monitor major global disturbance in the environment
and to give early warning of problems requiring international action.
Following UNCED, the organizations participating in Earthwatch have
focused Earthwatch on the priority requirements of Agenda 21 and on
the delivery of information for decision-making, as outlined in the
report of the Secretary General to the third session of the Commission
on Sustainable Development on Agenda 21, Chapter 40, and in the report
of the Executive Director of UNEP to the UNEP Governing Council in
response to General Assembly Resolution 48/192 on "Strengthening International
Cooperation in the monitoring of Global Environmental Problems". The
first meeting of the interagency Earthwatch Working Party, held in
Geneva from 1-2 June 1994, redefined the mission of the United Nations
System-wide Earthwatch as being to coordinate, harmonize and integrate
observing, assessment and reporting activities across the United Nations
system in order to provide environmental and appropriate socio-economic
information for national and international decision-making on sustainable
development and for early warning of emerging problems requiring international
action. A number of specific activities designed to make the system-wide
Earthwatch more operational were also identified.
5.
The review of the system-wide contributions to Earthwatch has revealed
the important role played by many agencies and organizations in different
aspects of environmental observation, assessment and information for
sustainable development. Over 30 significant interagency programmes
were identified, together with a large number of related activities
of United Nations system organizations. Even a partial costing suggests
that the total financial effort represented by these activities is
well over $50 million. Together they have great potential for meeting
many of the requirements of the United Nations System-Wide Earthwatch.
However, many of these activities have been developed in response
to specific agency mandates or sectoral problems. A considerable effort
will be required to reinforce these activities so as to develop their
full potential, to cross-link them and to strengthen collaboration
where appropriate, and to integrate the results into a coherent Earthwatch
process able to respond to the needs and expectations of the international
community.
6.
Through the the efforts of the interagency Earthwatch Working Party
and the work of UNEP as IACSD Task Manager for Earthwatch, the inputs
of all the agencies and organizations of the United Nations system
to Earthwatch have been identified, and mechanisms have been created
to strengthen collaboration and joint programming. One major component
of Earthwatch is the set of global observing systems with multi-agency
sponsorship which are being developed for climate, oceans and terrestrial
areas to make previously diffuse and scattered monitoring efforts
more coherent, operational and focused on key issues of global change
and sustainability.
7.
United Nations system organizations participating in Earthwatch are
counting on UNEP to carry out its coordinating function in this area
and to provide the necessary leadership to a more integrated system-wide
Earthwatch, through a combination of active participation and networking.
In particular, if UNEP reinforces linkages among expert information
fora on the one hand and decisions makers on the other (at national
and regional level, and within international policy arenas such as
the CSD) then a significant contribution shall have been made. The
ACC stresses the importance it places on Earthwatch being a system-wide
effort which requires the full participation and support of UNEP.
8.
The need for and expectations of Earthwatch have evolved since its
conception over twenty years ago. It is no longer sufficient just
to alert the world to emerging and important environmental trends
and problems. Environmental factors have to be integrated into political
and economic decision-making mechanisms, and become as fundamental
as economics in determining sustainable development. This will require
the development of a flow of environmental data producing indicators
for policy action to improve environmental protection and resource
management, which in turn will involve adjustments in economic development
process. This flow of information must be more rapid, so that timely
data and indicators are available when decision-makers need them.
Much of this must take place at the national level, but it is also
relevant at the global level., where Earthwatch is the mechanism to
provide this information.
9.
Earthwatch should pay special attention to the need for balance among
the requirements and capacities of various groups of countries in
environmental observation, assessment and reporting activities, to
ensure a reliable, accurate and objective flow of information at the
international level. This will require special emphasis on efforts
to fill the gaps in the global coverage of these activities through
capacity-building in information gathering and assessment that will
allow the full participation of all countries in the observation and
assessment processes.
10. The United
Nations system-wide Earthwatch should not only work to deliver more
integrated information for decision-making at the international level
through cooperation among the sectoral agencies, but should also promote
assistance to national governments to achieve a similar integration
of information at the national level, bridging the many departments
and ministries that should be involved. The tools and methodologies
now being developed in Earthwatch will be useful in this regard.
11. The principal
users of Earthwatch will thus include not only the various inter-governmental
decision-making bodies that have been created to adopt policy measures
and management actions in the various fields of environment and development,
but also decision-makers in national governments who are required
to know the international context within which their national actions
must take place in our increasingly inter-related world. Earthwatch
should also continue to supply information to the general public to
build support for the actions that are taken.
12. One problem
increasingly being faced by all the agencies participating in Earthwatch
which may require the policy attention of the Governing Council, is
that information for public purposes is increasingly becoming less
accessible. One constraint is the increasing cost of information,
as distinct from normal charges for connection or communications.
Non-governmental organizations, and even government departments, are
trying to find ways to cover the costs of their information services.
Data and information sales are seen as one option to achieve this.
In some countries, public services are being privatized. Since business
users of data can usually pass the costs on to their customers, data
charges are often set to what the private sector can afford to pay.
Public services and United Nations agencies cannot afford excessive
charges, and almost no policy-maker has a budget for obtaining the
information required for decision-making. Present market approaches,
however, do not recognize that the usefulness and value of information
is often increased through universal availability. There is also a
problem of the conflict of interest in access to information between
the particular and the public good, such as with information held
on damaging activities or dangerous properties in materials, whose
release could threaten the reputation of the holder or the market
for a product.
13. Governments
are also sensitive to the release of information that may be perceived
to be detrimental to legitimate national interests. This sensitivity
can be accentuated by the fear of bias in the use of the information,
for instance to favour particular economic systems, cultural models
or styles of development, or to give an advantage to particular national
or commercial interests. Yet in the common interest of the global
community, objective environmental information is vital. As a matter
of policy, the United Nations institutions must be the guarantor of
the objectivity and reliability in information at the international
level. Access by the United Nations system to the information required
for an effective Earthwatch also needs to be promoted.
Addressing
the interface between environment and development information
14. The changing
role of Earthwatch was reflected in the deliberations of the Earthwatch
Working party, where the participating agencies did not consider it
appropriate in the post-Rio period to consider the environment in
isolation from human activities, since decision-making for sustainable
development requires the integration of environmental, economic and
social information. The Working Party therefore suggested as one option
that a "Development Watch" should be created with which Earthwatch
could interact closely, as proposed in Chapter 40 of Agenda 21.
15. Already,
a number of efforts are being made to develop the methodologies for
linking and integrating environment and development information at
the regional and global levels to produce policy-relevant outputs,
in cooperation among United Nations system organizations and the scientific
community. For instance, UNEP, UNSTAT and DPCSD are cooperating with
the SCOPE project on indicators of sustainable development. UNEP is
exploring the usefulness of models, scenarios and projections through
cooperation with the Dutch National Institute of Public Health and
Environment (RIVM), the World Resources Institute, the International
Institute of Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and the Stockholm Environment
Institute, and is involving a number of research centres in developing
countries in these initiatives. The World Bank is also building its
information system with reference to sustainable development. Particular
attention is being paid to develop approaches suitable to all sizes
of countries, all regions, cultures, economic systems and levels of
development.
16. In response
to Chapter 40 of Agenda 21, a cooperative effort among the agencies
has also begun to prepare proposals on Development Watch for the Commission
on Sustainable Development. United Nations, UNDP and UNEP, inter-alia,
will play a key role in this efforts to develop methodologies and
indicators for subsequent consideration by governments and use by
countries in assessing the sustainability of their own development
at the national level. The challenge for a "development watch" will
be to select the data and indicators that best measure the status
and results of development in ways that are useful for policy and
decision-making, going beyond the traditional economic indicators
to cover more completely the issues raised in Agenda 21. A major focus
of this effort will be to contribute to the development of a work
programme for the Commission on Sustainable Development to produce
a core set of indicators for sustainable development, to be developed
by UNDPCSD/UNSTAT in close cooperation with UNEP. This will be a difficult
task requiring reliable data, agreement on standard definitions and
methodologies, and definition of a set of indicators for each of the
major issues for which Agenda 21 set goals. Careful attention must
be paid to balance so that all countries can select the indicators
that are appropriate to their own culture, resources and level of
development. The resulting indicators will need to combine economic,
social and environmental factors to produce indicators of sustainable
development. Such indicators, combined with other information on sustainability,
should help to stimulate and guide the national policy-making process.
In recognition of this there will be an emphasis on the need to include
capacity building as an integral part of the development of indicators,
information and delivery systems.
17. Earthwatch
will need to contribute to this process of defining and where necessary
providing the environmental information needed to combine with economic
and social data. It will also provide a global perspective to complement
and reinforce efforts of each nation to determine the sustainability
of its own development, since some elements of sustainability inevitably
extend beyond national borders.
18. Together,
these efforts aim to achieve the kind of management system for sustainable
development that we now use for economic development. The world needs
national and global data, assessment and early warning systems for
environment and sustainability comparable to those presently governing
the operation of economic decision-making. Linking Earthwatch with
its focus on the global environment and a "development watch", through
which countries can assess their own progress towards sustainability,
will give a more complete picture of the trends in sustainable development.
The two approaches (global and national) would produce joint outputs
on the progress, possibilities and limits of sustainable development.
The assembly within the framework of Earthwatch and "development watch"
of data and assessments to produce indicators and projections using
integrated conceptual frameworks, systems studies and models, will
assist the development of more future-oriented international policy
in an increasingly complex and integrated world.
ACC Recommendations
to the UNEP Governing Council
1.
The ACC draws the attention of the Governing Council to the importance
of Earthwatch as a United Nations system-wide activity and an essential
component of information for decision-making as agreed in Agenda 21.
It emphasizes the role of UNEP to provide leadership and direction
to the United Nations system-wide Earthwatch, to support inter-agency
coordination of observation, assessment and reporting activities,
and to assist in the joint programming and integration of results
that will make Earthwatch an effective effort of the United Nations
system to provide international environmental information required
for decision-making. It therefore recommends to the Governing Council
and to all interested organizations of the United Nations system that
sufficient resources be allocated to Earthwatch and to capacity-building
for information gathering to implement this responsibility effectively.
2.
The ACC considers that the Governing Council may wish to address ways
of promoting ready access to the environmental information essential
to ensure a coordinated and efficient approach to informed decision-making
for sustainable development, including the implementation of a United
Nations system-wide Earthwatch. The UNEP Secretariat might be requested
to convene an ad hoc governmental expert group on the issue to further
clarify the matter.
3.
The ACC recommends that UNEP and the other organizations involved
in the system-wide Earthwatch should continue to develop approaches
to the linking of socio-economic and environmental assessment and
reporting, and that the Earthwatch Working Party give further attention
to the conceptual issues involved. In this connection, the ACC also
recommends that UNEP and all concerned organizations of the United
Nations system participate actively in the process underway to initiate
a Development Watch and to ensure its close interlinkage with Earthwatch
as parts of an integrated system of information for decision-making
as recommended by Agenda 21.